I Am 2030 is a community story series created to elevate the voices of the people who care deeply about our schools and our future.
These are first-person reflections from parents, educators, staff, alumni, taxpayers, and neighbors — people stepping up because they’ve seen what’s working, what’s not, and what’s at stake. Each story shares a personal perspective: what someone has experienced, what they hope to protect or change, and why they support the work of 2030.
The goal is simple: to give our community a space to speak plainly and honestly, in their own words.
Stories are shared anonymously by default, unless a contributor chooses to include their name, and are lightly reviewed for safety before being published. Together, they reflect the breadth of experiences and concerns shaping this moment — and remind us that behind every policy discussion are real people and real stories.
This is what 2030 looks like. This is who we are.
This story is a first-person statement from Chris Merker, candidate for Wauwatosa School Board and member of the 2030 Slate.
"It was heartbreaking to watch McKinley — once one of Wauwatosa’s and Wisconsin’s strongest elementary schools — fall from grace.
Our family wasn’t on the sidelines. We were deeply involved. My wife served three years as PTO president. I volunteered at the chess club, coached soccer on the grounds, and spoke at High Interest Day. We loved the staff and trusted the culture. Then we watched things change fast: talented educators leaving, teachers coming out of meetings in tears, and a school community that had been stable and proud suddenly feeling shaken.
For many of us, it felt like a direct hit to the heart of our neighborhood — our kids, our teachers, our sense of safety and belonging.
Parents came together in force. We asked direct questions. We showed up. We documented. And we were pushed off, dismissed — at times even threatened — for simply insisting on accountability. But we persevered. After eight months of sustained effort, change finally happened—but it shouldn’t take that long for leadership to respond when a school community is hurting. The former principal at the center of the school's climate and culture crisis remains in a leadership role in the District — one of the reasons families are still asking for clearer accountability.
We took that energy and funneled it into the ongoing work of the 2030 Task Force and the community candidates now running together as the 2030 Slate. Along the way, we learned something simple: no one was going to come save us. We had to do the work ourselves — steadily, respectfully, and in the open.
Now we’re at the edge of an election. With the support and backing of this community, we intend to win—and then do what we said we would do: restore trust, strengthen stewardship, and deliver measurable results for students and families.
That’s why I’m running with the 2030 Slate: Heather Birk, Todd Koehler, Dan Stemper, and me. Join us."
- Chris Merker (Candidate Statement)
"I returned the recent survey back to the board. It does not apply to our future. Our immediate family has 5 generations of Wauwatosa residents. Our large family sent dozens of children through the school district. I and my wife have a combined 125 years residency in Wauwatosa. At this time, we are the only two remaining in Wauwatosa. The school district has a history of outstanding management, excellent student education and academic performance. The district was a top-tier educator. We are proud our children experienced a quality education. That excellence disappeared. The golden age of the Wauwatosa School District is over. As seniors we are willing to pay for children's education who are residents of Wauwatosa. But we are not going to pay for the declining student achievement, groupthink-driven leadership and the mismanagement of the district's real estate. We will no longer be your piggy bank payable in outrageous, out-of-control real estate taxes, some of the highest in the Nation. We decided to downsize 12 years ago with the goal of aging in place in our third Wauwatosa home. We regret that decision. It's time to vote with our feet. We started a relocation project to explore our options with the goal of leaving Wauwatosa and Milwaukee County. There is a strong possibility we will be taking our time, talent and money elsewhere."
- Retiree and Former Tosa Parent
"We have multiple kids in the school system and more starting soon. We found a program that challenged and helped our son enjoy school: USTEM. This program was dismantled because - as was told to us by Dr. Means at a PTO meeting - it “wasn’t diverse enough”. Just like other successful STEM programs throughout Tosa, it was dismantled and morphed from full-time STEM to just a few dozen minutes of meaningless “STEM for all”. Rather than expand on something that was successful and make it more accessible and diverse, they opted to dumb it down or eliminate it entirely. The school district isn’t producing the high level of results that the residents desire and command. Certainly nothing that warrants the floating of yet another referendum for a school district that lacks fiscal accountability or responsibility. I’m sick of political party blaming instead of the honest truth: the district spends too much, reserves too little, and uses phony “surveys” and “task forces” to advance superintendent-led reforms, all with a school board that acts on his behalf and views him as a boss that must be pleased, rather than representatives for us. The spending - both current and planned - is ridiculous. You could build an entire skyscraper that’s houses every single student and provides every technological resource needed for less than we’re spending. Yet, we’re going into extreme debt and producing average results 'for the kids.'"
- Parent
"I am a taxpayer and alum with no children in the system. I support the 2030 Task Force because I've been frustrated with the school district's actions with respect to the buildings ever since SOS. The decision and implementation process surrounding the SOS campaign to destroy or revamp four schools seemed to be corrupt and lacked a comprehensive long term master plan. Voters more recently approved another referendum and still we seem to lack long term, fiscally responsible plans. Citizens polled registered a preference to close schools and yet there are no plans to close elementary schools. The current befuddling survey is another example of piecemealing issues, and I'm not convinced it will yield meaning input. But then the Board can say that it asked the community, when it feels like I'm being steered to agree to a predetermined and undisclosed agenda that is driven by a disproportionate share of residents."
- Taxpayer and Tosa Alum
"I feel the current leadership has minimized legitimate, well supported concerns of parents around school and district decisions. Further, I am concerned about yet another request for hundreds of millions of dollars of additional funding through an unclear process. I support the 2030 Task Force because I believe their mix of business and education expertise will help ensure that funds are most effectively used for improving student performance and wellbeing, and I also think they represent a needed "back to basics" approach that understands that a strong school community involves retaining and supporting our talented teachers."
-Community Member
"At a recent school board meeting, we were told the district plans to bring in 148 open-enrollment students to help close a budget gap. The headline number sounded good -- $1.6 million -- but we also learned the district would only net about $1 million because the state doesn’t fully reimburse open enrollment.
Then came the warning: without those students, 10 teachers would need to be cut. I’m tired of hearing fear presented as the only option.
What makes this harder to accept is that teacher pay was supposed to be a priority. While the district points to a 31% salary increase over the past few years; rising healthcare premiums and deductibles - which are higher than in neighboring districts - have left many teachers with take-home pay substantially less than the 31% raise.
Voters approved a referendum with $8 million set aside for teacher salaries because we want to attract and keep great educators. Yet negotiations dragged on for months, and in the end, the district initially imposed a contract instead of honoring what voters supported. Only after teachers spoke up did the board approve a contract aligned with the referendum.
We’re not naive. There are smarter, more responsible ways to manage $1 million than threatening teachers or relying on open enrollment as a fix. Our community deserves honesty, better planning, and leadership that actually listens to community voices - not just its own.
- Jean Parulski, Retired Special Education Teacher (MPS & Elmbrook) & 40+ Year Tosa Resident
"As a parent, I never expected to feel this disconnected from our school district. Over the past few years, it has been painful to watch a once respected school board become broken, petulant, deferential, and driving agendas that have little to do with educating kids. I’ve attended meetings where basic educational concerns (class sizes, curriculum quality, student support) were sidelined while political posturing took center stage. Instead of thoughtful leadership, what I see now is a strong political machine protecting itself, not listening to families. What hurts most is the growing feeling that there is no longer a place in Tosa for families like ours; families who simply want excellent schools, transparency, and leaders who put students first. We’ve raised concerns, asked questions, and tried to engage in good faith, only to feel dismissed or labeled as a problem for not falling in line. That’s why Tosa 2030 matters so much to me. It represents a reset and a reminder of what our schools are supposed to be about. Tosa 2030 is focused on education first, not politics, not power, not personal ambition. It’s about restoring trust, centering decisions on students and learning, and rebuilding a school board that actually serves the community. As a parent, that focus gives me hope that Tosa can once again be a place where families feel welcomed, heard, and proud of their schools."
- Parent
"I am a retired taxpayer, and I have major concerns for our Tosa community. Three neighbors on my block are planning to or already have sold their homes. Another told us that she will be forced to sell if her property tax bill continues to increase. Friends in different neighborhoods are seeing this same trend including young families with children. The reasons are affordability and the poor test scores in math and reading. My own son will be moving his wife and son this summer and stated, "We cannot afford Wauwatosa and the schools do not meet the standards we are looking for."
- Retiree
"As a parent in the district for over 20 years, I have seen a steady decline in the quality of my kids’ education, especially most recently. I want to preface my story with the fact that there are some excellent teachers and teaching assistants in this district. My experience is different than most parents because two of my kids are part of the special education program. Their teachers and assistants are truly the best of this district, yet they are not given the recognition or support they deserve. The core problem in this district is the bloat of administrators and the school board. In my experience, concerns raised to administration or at board meetings are met with lip service — feigned concern but no action. Spending on ineffective programs and positions has been plentiful, while the programs that need focus are forgotten. Even worse, funding promised for special education programs and student improvements has been broken, delayed, or abandoned.
I am deeply disappointed in this district. When we moved here over 25 years ago, the schools were among the best in the Milwaukee area and the reason we chose to live here. Now, my family is ashamed to say that we stayed."
- Parent
Disclaimer: The 2030 Task Force is nonpartisan and does not endorse any political party or candidate or advance a partisan agenda. “2030 Slate” is a label used by candidates to signal alignment with the Task Force’s principles and findings.