A clear, weekly roundup of actions, alerts, and stories that matter. Forward freely. Act boldly.
LEAD STORY — MADISON ELEMENTARY POST-MEETING REPORT
On August 6, parents packed into Madison Elementary’s parent meeting — a room thick with tension — expecting answers. Instead, they heard district leaders recite policy, sidestep specifics, and shift blame to teachers who’d already left and couldn’t respond.
Independent post-meeting analysis documents:
Live parent testimony on non-enforcement of rules and worsening school climate.
Multi-year stability in proficiency before leadership upheaval.
A concrete accountability plan the district could adopt immediately.
What changed:
ELA: 53% → 61% Proficient/Advanced (2018–19 to 2023–24).
Math: Held roughly flat.
Decline began with 2023–25 leadership/climate shift and mass staff exits.
Parent testimony (selected):
“Bullying not addressed.”
“Concerns over special-needs continuity.”
“Concerns being dismissed.”
“I’ve met several times with the principal… she doesn’t even know my kid’s name.”
Leadership response & Policy 9130 shield: Superintendent Means directed parents to Policy 9130 — the complaint process requiring concerns to be routed through the Superintendent before the Board will engage. Analysis calls this process over substance: testimony is sidelined unless funneled through the office under scrutiny.
The binary framing: Means presented a false choice — either “oppositional language… or rally for the kids.” The report calls this a narrative trap that reframes accountability as anti-student.
Why it matters: As the administration itself said, “So goes Madison, so goes the District.” What’s playing out at Madison is a microcosm of the broader district collapse documented by the 2030 Task Force.
Means said several times “the community is worried about cost” suggesting dollars simply aren’t available to Madison; when one audience member pointed out the nearly 100% increase in the superintendent’s personal budget as a potential funding source, while schools are cut across the board, the room erupted.
POLICY 9130 — WHAT IT ACTUALLY DOES
Public Requests, Suggestions, or Complaints (rev. Apr. 22, 2024) routes all complaints first to the Superintendent before they can reach the Board. This means:
Gatekeeper = Subject of complaint — Oversight is filtered by the very office under review.
Process over substance — Testimony and investigations are sidelined unless passed through Superintendent-controlled channels.
Immediate Board actions requested:
Suspend 9130 routing for any complaint involving the Superintendent or senior leadership.
Establish direct Board intake with confidentiality safeguards.
Context: On May 31, the 2030 Task Force warned the Board about administrative capture. Aug. 6’s reliance on 9130 reaffirmed it publicly. Task Force live public comments at the Aug. 11 board meeting brought forward this issue once again directly to the board. No response.
FACILITIES & FINANCE WATCH - FAIT ACCOMPLI?
Model A1 — $350.7M Proposal
Closure of Longfellow & Whitman
7–12 configuration at East & West
East-only pool upgrades
Framed as “community expectations” path
Cumulative load since 2018:
2018: $124.9M capital referendum
2024: $124.4M from twin referenda
2025: ~$350M proposed secondary facilities
2028 forecast: ~$120M+ more in operating referenda
Key issue: Despite hundreds of millions borrowed since 2018, deferred maintenance will return to ~$150M by 2026—nearly unchanged from pre-2018 levels.
The plan openly frames the most fiscally cautious options as “not meeting community desires,” linking cost escalation to sentiment for small neighborhood schools and historic buildings.
From a former 2075 Task Force member: “They are moving full steam ahead with Model A1. The ad hoc committee is just a farce. This is Means’ narrative. It’s our fault they are making poor financial decisions.”
GOVERNANCE & TRANSPARENCY — CITY–SCHOOL COLLABORATION?
Onward Tosa reports the City and School Board are moving toward coordinated talks on secondary restructuring and possible footprint reductions, via a template letter to the City Administrator.
Concern: Bypassing the elected Common Council risks making this an administrative exercise rather than a public, democratic process.
What to insist on:
Route through the Council agenda with recorded vote.
Open, joint public session — no staff-only pre-meetings.
Public draft MOU clarifying City vs. District roles before property moves.
NEW COMMUNITY REPORT — WAUWATOSA SCHOOL DISTRICT: AN EXPOSÉ
"Wauwatosa School District: An Exposé of Funding, Performance, and Possible Corruption”
An independent report by Fernando Topete — now circulating in community social media — documents:
$12M+ in budget errors & overspending
Deferred maintenance despite $124.9M referendum
Push to close top-ranked WSTEM
Rising admin costs during academic decline
Findings mirror some of the xCore Report and 2030 Task Force investigations.
CHARTER OVERSIGHT — WVA VS. WSTEM
Wauwatosa Virtual Academy is ESSA-identified for Comprehensive Support & Improvement – Low Graduation Rate (CSI-LG), requiring a DPI-monitored improvement plan. Contractual governance elements — independent council, three-year review, amendments — remain unclear.
Contrast: District dismantled WSTEM aggressively but has left WVA largely untouched despite state-level red flags.
READERS WRITE IN — TED MARTIN TIMELINE
Readers flagged a possible sequence issue:
Martin’s application: July 16
Publicly named Director of Recreation: Early July
Raises questions about:
Whether position was posted competitively.
Posting dates, candidate pool, and interview process.
Salary/funding source alignment with predecessor.
This was in response to last week’s blurb: Ted Martin Resurfaces — As Classrooms Are Cut
See something? Hear something? Know something? Reach out to us: 2030TaskForce@gmail.com or visit us at www.Tosa2030.com
CALL TO ACTION
Demand public, joint City–WSD sessions before restructuring or land-use commitments.
Insist on independent complaint intake for Madison & districtwide issues.
Require a facilities dashboard — site-by-site deferred maintenance, timelines, funding AND a fiscally-managed, district-wide plan before a single additional tax increase is proposed.
Join the Task Force or subscribe to the weekly Ledger: https://www.tosa2030.com/contact
Disclaimer
All views reflect testimony, public records, and editorial opinion from the 2030 Task Force and community contributors. Allegations are supported with source documentation where noted.